Well, this one is a little short for the Sheep MAster´s
usual happiness, but I think you all will get a small kick outofit.
Hope you like it. As usual, my responses are in bold text.
- recreational_christianity: where do you get that jesus proved
cobymichael: God raised him from the dead
cobymichael: enough said
recreational_christianity: where is your proof?
recreational_christianity: dont say the bible....
cobymichael: prophecy concerning the jew
recreational_christianity: unless you can establish it as reliable
cobymichael: god doesn't have to prove himself
recreational_christianity: well the bible is not a proof....
and all we know about jesus is from the bible... now, if you can
show the bible is reliable.... then you can say anything you want
about proof... till then all you do is believe, and that is nothing
in the way of proof
cobymichael: many writers that don't believe in Jesus wrote about
cobymichael: non christians
recreational_christianity: wrong answer. they are bout christians,
interpolations, or never mention jesus by name... some mention
only christians, or the name chrestus... a common freeman name....
recreational_christianity: try again
recreational_christianity: there is nothing outside of your bible.
cobymichael: christos, meant the annointed one
cobymichael: only one annointed one
recreational_christianity: like i said, there is no reason to
believe your claims of proof.
cobymichael: your own concious bears witness to God
recreational_christianity: again wrong
recreational_christianity: you are assuming something for me.
and you cannot do that.
cobymichael: not to mention creation, and the ordered manner of
recreational_christianity: again you are using an argument
for belief and not proof.
cobymichael: does a good man accept worship if he isn't God?
cobymichael: Jesus did
cobymichael: is he good?
recreational_christianity: if you claim your own personal experience
as a proof, then you cannot dismiss my personal proof that he
does not exist... double standard
recreational_christianity: jesus is said to have accepted worship,
but you have yet to show the bible is reliable.
cobymichael: if you dismiss the created order of things, your
a lair or ignorant
recreational_christianity: again you are wrong. and what does
your bible say about judging me, and calling me a liar... let
cobymichael: and a conversation is impossible under those conditions
recreational_christianity: if you understood the nature of
your arguments, then you would not use them as you do
recreational_christianity: plus you use these arguments as if
there is no other conclusion to be drawn.
recreational_christianity: if you understood any of them you would
know that they are arguments for a belief in a "god".....
these cannot be used as proof.... and they would not even show
that your god is the god that created. do you see that? the only
thing you have to define your god, or back it up is the bible,
and that is not even close to reliable evidence.
recreational_christianity: nice try though.